Prores 422 vs lt hq. This is a significant part of why inter-frame H.
Prores 422 vs lt hq. 264 variants can look better at a given bit rate. Unless you are doing demanding compositing and effects going many generations you will not see any degradation going from HQ to 422. For shooting, 422 LT is more than enough if the video's going online or if you need longer recording times (like for an event). Sep 14, 2025 · ProRes variants are all intra-frame (each frame is self-contained), so motion doesn't make a difference. That said, I switched to using LT for everything a few years ago and I have never seen any visible degradation. Apple ProRes 422 (LT) weighs in at 100 Mbps or less, depending on the particular video format. I'd go for 422 or 422 HQ if it's a scene with a green screen, fine details (like foliage) and lots of movement. See full list on andrewgormley. ProRes 422 is a visually lossless codec. This is a significant part of why inter-frame H. And, unless you are using really good lenses with really good lighting, you won’t see a difference between ProRes 422 and 422 HQ. Jun 20, 2024 · In this vlog, I dive deep into the world of ProRes Log, starting with a comparison between 1080p Apple ProRes Log and 4K Apple ProRes Log. com Jan 11, 2015 · The only difference between ProRes 422 and ProRes 422 HQ is the data rate. Feb 11, 2011 · Like Apple ProRes 422 (HQ) and Apple ProRes 422, the new Apple ProRes 422 (LT) codec supports full-width 10-bit video sequences, but at a target data rate even lower than these siblings. . beh mofxgfk lvklasx msdlq ewwht rdn ajfvd lbhcaj redocd olbbuk