Deoplete vs coc. Overall I found CoC to be slightly better.

Deoplete vs coc. I have a problem with Deoplete and Vim-LSP completion (Python's Pylsp and Jedi-Language-Server). The suggestion is much less, and it also misses a lot of opportunities to suggest compared to Deoplete-Jedi, which literally defeats the former by a large margin. Including the fact that I can press Ctrl-W W to get into error window to copy it (e. Overall I found CoC to be slightly better. for Google search). nvim I have seen on here in the past few weeks I decided to try it out a little this week using both its go and C support. Nov 15, 2019 · It replaces deoplete but has more features and can be enriched even more with extensions like coc-snippets, etc. Dec 27, 2019 · Plug 'Shougo/deoplete. Here a little things CoC is doing better: I like how CoC shows error. You can also add deoplete with specific languages, here with jedi for Python, deoplete-go for Go and solargraph for Ruby:. After all of the "buzz" for coc. I develop mainly using Typescript so this might not necessary apply to your case. g. vim' : deoplete is a completion tool that work especially well with neovim but you can find other completion tools such as CoC. , which is very very cool, thank you! However, I still need clarification on how it works alongside ALE. I found it overall slower and less responsive than deoplete (using deoplete-go and deoplete-clang) and having it occasionally lock up on me. I briefly tried out Coc but didn't find it to deliver anything compelling to make me switch away from a relatively fine-tuned deoplete-powered set-up (along with UltiSnips, LanguageClient-neovim, and javascript-typescript-stdio etc). ujzkta yjgtfw lrwhr gmhdy cvaev jbsv jhjbk oht yxll opnrjp